Why They Minimise What They Did.
- lifeaftertraumathe
- Apr 9
- 2 min read
Why They Minimise What They Did.
One of the most confusing parts of a toxic relationship isn’t what happened, it's what happens after.
You bring something up. Something that hurt you, something that crossed a line, something that stayed with you long after it happened.
And instead of accountability…
you get minimisation.
“It wasn’t that bad.”
“You’re overreacting.”
“You’re too sensitive.”
“I didn’t mean it like that.”
And just like that, the focus shifts.
From what they did…
to how you reacted.
Minimising is not misunderstanding, it’s avoidance. Deflection.
When someone minimises their behaviour, they’re not trying to understand you.
They’re trying to avoid responsibility.
Because if they fully acknowledged what they did, they would have to:
Take ownership
Feel guilt or shame
Change their behaviour
And not everyone is willing to do that. (Or able!)
So instead, they shrink the situation.
They downplay it.
They dilute it.
They rewrite it.
They deflect it.
They redirect it.
Eventually you start questioning whether it even mattered in the first place.
It creates self-doubt (and this is where it can start falling into gaslighting territory).
This is where the real damage happens.
Over time, you stop trusting your own emotional responses.
You start thinking:
“Maybe I am too sensitive”
“Maybe I did make a big deal out of nothing”
“Maybe it wasn’t as bad as I remember”
And that’s how your reality slowly gets replaced with theirs.
Not through force…but through repetition (of their behaviour).
Their goal isn’t resolution. It's control of the narrative, the 'relationship', and in some cases, you.
Healthy people want to resolve things. They might not get it perfect, but they’ll try to understand, reflect, and repair.
Minimising does the opposite.
It shuts the conversation down.
It keeps them in the position of being “right” (and ultimately in the end, in control) ...
and you in the position of having to justify your feelings.
When you’re constantly having to prove that something hurt you…
you end up exhausted. Mentally. Spiritually. Physically.
You don’t need them to agree for it to be valid
This is the important part to remember though.
Your experience does not become valid only when someone else agrees with it.
If it hurt you, it hurt you.
If it crossed a line for you, it crossed a line.
If it stayed with you, affected you, changed how you felt… then it mattered.
Full stop.
Minimisation is a form of emotional deflection and ultimately, abuse.
The more you try to get someone to admit what they did,
the more you can end up staying stuck in the dynamic.
Sometimes the shift isn’t:
“Can I make them understand?”
It’s “Why am I still explaining something that was clear the first time?”
Later I'll be doing a post on how to deal with those situations.
Comments